| |
Love Thailand, support Thailand
(Modernize her; make her a great nation)
Bangkok is a mindset center for the Thai people. Chosen by King Rama the
First of the Chackri Dynasty, Bangkok replaces the former capital city
on the opposite bank of the Chaopraya River, Thonburi for the present
capital city of the country.
The two cities are similarly located on soft and low land, parts of the
Chaopraya River delta. Unlike other cities on higher grounds, both Bangkok
and Thonburi are badly aggravated by many problems. Drainage, flood prevention,
as well as structural foundation for serious high-rise buildings are more
expensive to build than in many other places in the world.
But otherwise Bangkok is unique and charming, as any other tropical settlement.
Romantically it was once named Venice of the East for its abundant network
of canals. Under several myopic vision leaderships, the city embraces
short-term automobile influences; most canals are disappeared. The remaining
ones are not properly maintained. Additionally over-speculate developments
responding to the recent economic-booming-cycle, delivered under inadequate
zoning and regulating environment, as well as the severe influx of population
migration change Bangkok for the worst.
How different the city is, in the Thai mindset, Bangkok is still a name
for admiration, the country’s capital city, the place where the monarch
resides, and the place for formal dignitary reception.
During the last 30 years Bangkok has been experiencing over populated
problems. The city agonizes through nightmare traffic problems, flooding,
water pollution, air pollution, and the inner city’s high temperature
trending. The governments have tried their best to correct the problems.
Elevated roadways, inner-city elevated electric rails, city-flooding controls,
and many other remedies have been undertaken.
Visitors, who are not familiar with the day-to-day Bangkok’s routines,
will hardly recognize the city that they used to know. How each feels
about these, happy or disappointed depends on the individual’s background.
The visitors, the Thais abroad or upcountry, always have the feeling
for Bangkok as a noble place, a model of all good stuff that represents
their Thai-pride. They wish Bangkok and its resident well; they hope Bangkok
remain a bright spot in the Thai civilization that they can tell their
children about in the years to come. They hope to tell their children
that Bangkok is beautiful, clean, charming, safe, and worth every minute
of visiting.
In the last 30-40 years, the governments appear to have lost the battles
in making Bangkok a bright spot. The governments focus heavily in correcting
the end-problems; they lost perspectives of what has caused the problems.
Bangkok is a major magnetic force. It draws citizens from all parts of
the country for jobs, education, and health care. Population in Bangkok
has long peaked and exceeded the city’s capacity. It expresses the symptoms
in the forms of failing traffic, housing scarcity, extra long commuting
time, low quality public health, increase of crime, etc.
The governments correct the end problems that they see; more and more
people will perpetually continue to pour into Bangkok. This is because
such end-problem-solving works as both job creation itself as well as
the invitation to increase new users. Most migrated workers, once getting
jobs in Bangkok will end up settling in the City. At the same time certain
problems, once corrected, draw more people to be in Bangkok. This is the
work that backfires and it will never end.
Bangkok will be recovered should it ever experience any meaningful population
decline. This will happen when citizens in remote and small towns have
choices. The people should have all they need such as jobs, housing, health
care, education as well as prides in places that called homes.
When the capital city and small towns share responsibilities in being
good places to live and work, Bangkok will turn into the City of Angel
once again. Bangkok will be a clean city. Low land with wastewater will
be developed and used for recreational and park systems. Substandard buildings
must be demolished to make ways for neighborhood parks. Wastewater and
trash will be reduced to a manageable level. Polluted water will have
a chance to redeem itself. Fish population will rejuvenate which in turn
will help to keep mosquito population in checked. City buses, that are
as hot and steamy as pizza ovens, will cool down with more seating and
standing rooms available. Commuting time will be reduced, automobile fume
will be cut down to a negligible level, thus, city air will be clean,
and the inner city’s temperature will be reduced.
Small towns will be livable and well populated. The people will be contented
with the village living environment and develop positive ties to their
homeland. Under developed territories will afford proper infrastructure.
The villagers will enjoy well-planned communities, well-planned roadways,
well-planned monasteries, and well-planned farms and orchards. The people
will live with pride and enjoy good mental health.
Should we fail to accept and understand the problems, and continue to
throw the money away, Bangkok will be full of diseases. Chiangmai will
be sure to follow the trend. Beautiful resorts such as Phuket will start
to disappear soon. We all will lose what our forebears have left for us.
Such lost is amounted to losing Thailand, the cultural identities or as
losing war in an analogy to the poem written so powerfully by the King
Rama the Sixth.
Should Siam continues to live,
Siam lives, we all shall live.
If Siam’s destroyed, will we ever exist?
We will all end to ever exist;
Like dead, we are and no longer who we were.
When our homeland exists, visiting will be present. Whether it is Bangkok,
Thonburi, Nakorn-Patome, Chiangmai or Konkan, we will want to see our
friends with happiness.
Who ever the invaders will
Invade; fight to the end we will;
Sacrifice flesh and blood, we came.
Our lives lost, saving our fame.
The invaders, this time, did not come from beyond the borders. The invaders
came from within and add to our confusion. We may result in life-lost
and yet saving no fame.
How can the population in the Capital City be reduced? Population in
Bangkok or other big cities can be reduced through cooperation of the
three sectors: Governments; private sector; and the general public. The
governments must increase pay scales for its employees who work in small
towns. It must make affordable goods and service available in the villages
and small communities. It must improve and expand transportation system
connecting big cities and small towns for shorter traveling time. Private
sectors must search and capitalize in resources and talents in rural districts
for its own welfare. Natural features, cultures, tradition, local industries,
local scholars, and athletic talents are ways to create jobs and income.
The general public must understand not risking life, living in cities
plagued with decease and discomfort such as Bangkok even where high-paying
jobs are available.
This battle will be long because we have allowed the enemy to advance
for 30-40 years, if not more. We will win the battle and the war, when
we know where the enemy is, leaving the homeland for our young generation
to enjoy.
Hello:
Peter Nguyen (of Marco Island, FL) forwarded me this story (from some body else I don't know). This is exactly how I see myself doing. Come to America so that I can go back to Thailand 50 years later to have a good life (which I once had). Please don't make Thailand America; then I have no place to go to.
Chalermpol (Charles) Intha
Newton, Massachusetts
The story begins:
A boat docked in a tiny Mexican village. An American tourist
complimented the Mexican fisherman on the quality of his fish
and asked how long it took him to catch them.
"Not very long," answered the Mexican.
"But then, why didn't you stay out longer and catch more?" asked
the American.
The Mexican explained that his small catch was sufficient to
meet his needs and those of his family.
The American asked, "But what do you do with the rest of your
time?"
"I sleep late, fish a little, play with my children, and take a
siesta with my wife. In the evenings, I go into the village to
see my friends, play the guitar, and sing a few songs...
I have a full life."
The American interrupted, "I have an MBA from Harvard, and I can
help you! You should start by fishing longer every day. You
can then sell the extra fish you catch. With the extra revenue,
you can buy a bigger boat."
"And after that?" asked the Mexican.
"With the extra money the larger boat will bring, you can buy a
second one and a third one and so on until you have an entire
fleet of trawlers. Instead of selling your fish to a middle
man, you can then negotiate directly with the processing plants
and maybe even open your own plant. You can then leave this
little village and move to Mexico City, Los Angeles, or even New
York City! From there you can direct your huge new enterprise."
"How long would that take?" asked the Mexican.
"Twenty, perhaps twenty-five years," replied the American.
"And after that?"
"Afterwards? Well my Friend, That's when it gets really
interesting," answered the American, laughing. "When your
business gets really big, you can start selling stocks and make
millions!"
"Millions? Really? And after that?" said the Mexican.
"After that you'll be able to retire, live in a tiny village
near the coast, sleep late, play with your children, catch a few
fish, take a siesta with your wife and spend your evenings
doing what you like and enjoying your friends."
This is not funny; it starts to sound like my life.
Peter? What the hell is going on?
CI.
Charles Intha
HOMELAND SOCIETY INC
NOVEMBER, 2001
|